Skip to content

The Cristar Collapsible 5cm F2

I recently had the chance to purchase a Fuji Photo collapsible Cristar 5cm F2 on eBay at a favorable price. I knew nothing about this lens when I saw it for sale, but I did know that vintage M39 lenses from Fuji were all fairly uncommon so I took a risk and bought it right away. As it turns out, the Cristar 5cm F2 is not only uncommon, but actually rare. In fact very little information about it is actually available on the Web, so I will try to relate my experiences (so far) with this interesting lens.

When the lens arrived the glass and cosmetic condition look quite good, but the iris action was frozen so I took it to my camera technician for a CLA and now everything is smooth and normal. Here are some photos of my Cristar (SN# 411331).

cristar-0

cristar-3

cristar-4cristar-1

Here are some specs on the Cristar:

Weight: About 7.2 ounces ( 204 grams)
Filter Thread: No thread – Appears to use 42mm slip-on filters, but not verified
Extension from camera body at infinity focus: 1.67″ (42 mm)
Elements: Unkown
Minimum Aperture: F12.5, non-detented stops

One interesting aspect of the Cristar are the engraved iris selections of: 2, 2.2, 3.2, 4.5, 6.3, 9, and 12.5. These are of atypical by today’s standards, which associates this lens chronologically with an era when there were no standard iris setting (perhaps the early 1950’s). Such a fast maximum aperture setting is also consistent with films in use in the early 50’s, which overall were considerably slower than films today. In that era an F2 lens like the Cristar would have been a rather fast lens.

The lens has no front filter thread. I measured slightly less than a 42mm diameter on the outer knurled front ring of the lens, suggesting the use of 42mm slip-on filters. I believe 42mm filters were used at one point by Zeiss for Contax rangefinder lenses, although I think there were some slip-on fittings for at least some versions of the Summitar.

My impressions of the Cristar physically is that it is quite similar to the Leica Summitar which I once owned. In fact one may reasonably assume it is a copy of the Summitar to some degree. We can see there are a number of unanswered questions regarding this lens. Among them are when and how many were made? Were they sold as a stand-along product, or were they made for some particular M39 body? Were there any accessories sold for it such as filters or hoods? Anyone who might have such information is particularly welcome to comment!

Of course another question would be, how does this lens perform? Is it comparable to the Summitar or is it difference. The Summitar was a very sharp lens with a modern character, which in my opinion approaches the performance of its immediate descendant the renowned Leica 50/2 Summicron. To help understand the optical quality of the Cristar, I tested it with my Tower 48 M39 body (also reviewed in this blog).

Here are a few shots taken with Arista 100 and processed with Kodak HC110 (dilution B) and scanned on my Canoscan 8800F. No sharpening of the scanned images was done although I made some slight adjustments to the contrast and brightness in post processing. The exposure times were not recorded, but generally the lens was fairly closed down for the daylight shots, and nearly open (or fully open) for the interior shots (natural light).

I’ll leave it to the reader to make his evaluation of the above snapshots as far as lens performance is concerned, but my impressions are that optically the lens is better than I actually expected. In fact the performance, while perhaps not quite on a par with the Summitar is quite good (see Ken Rockwell’s excellent Web site for a nice review of the Summitar). I plan to do more testing soon and post the results here — perhaps with color film.

Advertisements

The Sankyo Koki Tokyo W. Komura 35 mm F2.8 for Nikon rangefinder

I acquired a W. Komura 35mm f2.8 for Nikon rangefinder mount about two years ago and tried it just recently. The lens is in excellent physical and optical condition, except for the fact that it has a small serial identity number hand engraved on the lens barrel. The lens came with the original case, finder, and rear cap.

Here are some photos of the lens mounted on my Bessa R2C, which is a modern Contax rangefinder lens mount compatible camera made in the recent past by Cosina. My Komura 35mm F2.8 was made for Nikon rangefinder mount, not Contax rangefinder, as evidenced by the tell-tale factory N engraving on the barrel.

First here is a photo of the lens on my Bessa R2C followed by images taken with the lens. The film was Agfa ISO 200 color print film professionally processed, and scanned by by Canon 8800F flatbed scanner.

I will post some more data on this lens when I update this blog over the coming holidays.

komura-3

near-hemet-ca scan_0003-largesize-reduced scan_0006-smaller scan_0010-red scan_0012-red

More shots with the Leotax 5 cm F3.5 Simlar

I needed to test a Leotax K. The camera works great! The lens is a Simlar 5 cm F3.5 and the film is Kentmere 100 self processed.

dt-upland-2dt-upland-1dt-upland-4

More Leonon 5 cm F2 Sample Shots

These were all taken with the Leonon 5 cm F2 on a Canon IIb body. The film was Arista 100 Ultra EDU self developed.

scan_0010

scan_0009

scan_0018

The Leonon 5 cm F2 from the Leotax Camera Company, Limited!

My apologies to readers of this blog as I’ve been away for a while enduring a career change and other life changes, which have kept me from photo hobbies for the most part. That and the decline of easy and inexpensive to access film processing facilities where I live has slowed down my blogging here. The good news is that I’ve now starting processing my own C41 and black and white film (the last time was in the 1970’s for me) and this will allow me to review more interesting cameras and lenses. Soon I hope to start processing E6  as well, for what is probably the best color experience obtainable on film in our era of declining film use.

Not too long ago I had a chance to obtain the somewhat rare Leonon 5 cm F2. I purchased this from one of the many excellent small sellers on eBay in Japan who deal in this genre of collectible vintage Japanese cameras. These sellers often have quite refined taste in such items, reasonable prices, and excellent customer service (as is typical in Japan). Look for them — there are several and I recommend them!

leonon-2

I’m sure the Leonon 5 cm F2 is more common in Japan than here in the US, but I am sure it is hard to find anywhere, probably even in the era when it was made. It is a good example of the outstanding Japanese photo optical engineering that took place, starting on a relatively small scale, in the 1950’s. A camera lens of this caliber is a non-trivial endeavor, particularly for a small firm, and particularly in the 1950’s. Remember that F2 was considered fast for a prime lens in the 1950’s, and it was expensive. The performance bar had been set by the Europeans, most particularly Zeiss and Leica, so a successful product had to at least approach that level of performance to justify the high price.

From HPR’s great reference book (“Leica Copies”), as best as I can tell the Leonon was sold with the Leotax FV and Elite (T 2L) which were bottom loading rapid wind camera bodies made from about 1958-1961. No more than about 6000 of these cameras were made and they were also sold with the Topcon Topcor 5 cm F2 (reviewed earlier here). Thus no more than a few thousand Leonon’s were made, and I’m sure much fewer exist today. It may not be rare, but it is certainly an uncommon lens! Note that HPR incorrectly calls the Leonon the “Lenon”.

Here are some specs on the Leonon:

Weight: 8 ounces ( 227 grams)
Filter Thread: 40.5 mm
Extension from camera body at infinity focus:  1.6″ (41 mm)
Elements: (5-6 probably)
Minimum Aperture: F22, detented stops

This is a elegantly well engineered lens. It is rather compact requiring only 40.5 mm filters, similar to many Nikon and Contax rangefinder lenses. The mill and lathe work is excellent, particularly the milled focus ring, which is also a different dark brown metallic tint than the rest of the lens which is black and chrome in finish. The engravings are all finely made and fill-painted white, with large, easy to see reference lines for the f-stop settings. This is especially useful when deploying the lens on an unmetered camera body. The lens has a nicely finished chrome plated focus lever without an infinity lock.

The first group of photos are of my particular Leonon, serial number 230733, taken with my point-and-shoot digital camera. The photos that follow were taken on Easter afternoon of 2014 mostly in the old-town center of the town I live in, Upland, California. The place was almost uninhabited that day (the city planners here are trying to revive the town center with limited success). No art is intended here, just a lens test. The film was Fuji Reala X-Tra 400, which is a commonly available and low-priced C41 process color print film from Japan. I developed and scanned the film myself, with mixed results as I needed to color balance out a faint purplish tint, which as I understand it can be due to temperature error in the developer (quite likely as I am not using real sophisticated equipment for this). My color processing skills will hopefully improved with time and allow me to start testing interesting lenses again.

 

leonon-1

 

leonon-3

leonon-4

leonon-5

leonon-6

scan_0001-red

scan_0002-red

scan_0003-red

scan_0005-red

scan_0006-red

scan_0007-red

scan_0008-red

scan_0009-red

scan_0010-red

scan_0011-red

scan_0012-red

scan_0013-red

scan_0016-red

 

scan_0015-red

 

 

 

The Canon 28mm F2.8 in Leica Thread Mount

I had the chance recently to purchase a Canon 28mm F2.8 for Leica thread mount compatible rangefinders. This is a rather sought after lens since it is relatively fast for a LTM rangefinder wide-angle lens. Many potential users are drawn to consider the Canon 28/2.8 because of their positive experience using the much more common, but one stop slower, Canon 28mm F3.5 in LTM. Others are seeking a modestly priced wide-angle in Leica thread mount are probably hoping that a somewhat older lens might satisfy their need and perhaps be obtainable at a modest price.

Does the Canon 28/2.8 meet these needs? Well, first of all, inexpensive it is not! Good examples have recently sold for between $350 and $650 on eBay, with prices increasing significantly in recent years. These prices are comparable to the Voigtlander Ultron 28 F1.9 an excellent modern, fast wide rangefinder optic, and are beginning to even approach the lower end of the M-mount Leica 28mm f2.8 Elmarit range. The reason for the high cost is the relative scarcity of the 28/2.8 compared to the more common Canon/Serenar 28/3.5. Contributing to this is the relative scarcity of 28mm lenses in LTM in general, vintage or modern.

Having a bit of experience in optical design myself, I can imagine that the engineering requirements required to routinely design and manufacture a lens of this nature were a significant challenge to optical engineers in the era in which the Leica thread mount systems were part of the mainstream of the photographic world (say 1930-1960). While many examples of faster LTM 28mm lenses were in fact made in this era, most were produced in small quantities and are vanishingly rare, and those easily found today are expensive. By the 1960’s few manufacturers produced LTM lenses in large quantities, wide angle or not, contributing to the dearth of such lenses. More recently users of rangefinders have been blessed by production of a variety of short focal length lenses by Cosina-Voligtlander at modest prices, although the existing quantities are still modest and this company is now producing mostly (if not totally) M mount rangefinder lenses. These factors, together with the unabated passion for LTM collectible lenses of many (including this blogger) has kept the prices of the Canon 28/2.8 LTM high, and I am sure it is likely to get even higher.

My 28/2.8 had been recently cleaned and lubricated (CLA) by a known classic camera expert in Japan for the previous owner (also in Japan).  It was, like most Japanese sourced product, in very good condition. On many such lenses one often finds pitting on the chrome as well as glass issues, some of which cannot be surmounted even with a CLA. My 28/2.8 has both excellent cosmetics and very clean and clear damage-free glass.

The basic specs on this lens are covered at the online Canon Museum and other web sites and books so I will not go into excessive detail about these. See for instance:

http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/s/data/19-35/s_28_28.html

Some key virtues of the 28/2.8 are that this lens is light and quite compact. Note that the Canon web site lists the 28/2.8 manufacture date beginning as 1957, a full six years after the debut of the Canon Serenar 28/3.5. This I believe attests to the difficulty of making this lens, the advancement of Canon technologically, as well as the growing public demand for such fast wides at the time.

Here are some digital photos of my Canon 28/2.8 on my Leotax F body with a black Canon 28mm finder. The filter in this setup was a Walz 1A:

canon28mm-setup-1

canon28mm-setup-5

canon28mm-setup-7

canon28mm-setup-3

canon28mm-setup-2

canon28mm-setup-6

Now here are some photos taken with the 28mm F2.8. The camera was the Leotax above and the film was Agfa ISO 100 C41 film. This was processed at a 1 hour local lab where they mishandled the negatives adding fingerprints and dust. I scanned it on my CanonScan 8800F and used the GIMP photo editor to largely clean up the damage to the negatives, as well as to rebalance the color and exposure a bit. These shots were taken mostly at mid-aperture settings (like F5.6 and F8) as I recall. No sharpening was done and the negatives were scanned at 1200 dpi. I’m not claiming to do exhaustive scientific testing here, but just obtaining basic impressions of performance and convenience of use.

IMG_0002

IMG

IMG_0003

IMG_0008

IMG_0024

IMG_0013

IMG_0023

My impressions are that this lens is somewhat sharper (at least at mid apertures) than it is often given credit for. It does clearly indicate some noticeable vignetting at the corners, which is quite common in vintage wides and not particularly objectionable to some (including me). I would say the color rendition and contrast are good, but not stunning.  I did not use a hood in these photos and that might have improved the results.

My experience using the 28/2.8 wide open is limited, but I did own another example a few years ago and found that it was noticeably unsharp wide open, but my testing was limited and not particularly careful. It is certainly a recommended lens for anyone wanting a compact, beautifully made, and collectible wide-angle lens for use, and it will appreciate in value over the years. I would not recommend the Canon 28/2.8  for the most critical or commercial applications, nor to anyone needing a wide-angle rangefinder lens at a budget price. All said, I can say, as with most Canon rangefinder lenses and cameras (practical considerations aside) that it is a true pleasure to use!

The Tokyo Optical 5cm F3.5 Simlar

I recently bought a Leotax D IV with a 5cm F3.5 Simlar. The D III is a rare enough camera that I will probably have it CLA’d with new curtains soon, but my main interest in this purchase was the Simlar. I find the combination of a light collapsible lens and a Leica III-type bottom loading rangefinder to be about the best grab-and-go classic camera combination for actual use there is.

The Simlar 5cm F3.5, made by Tokyo Optical (which I think believe is the same company that eventually became what we knew more commonly as Topcon) appears to be a close copy of the Leica 5cm F3.5 Elmar. It heralds from the early to mid-fifties when the Japanese were so effectively copying Leica products as well as those of other German camera makers. Of course the Japanese took this industriousness well beyond copying and at some point and began to innovate on their own, eventually dominating the 35mm camera market world-wide.

The Simlar is collapsible like the Elmar and seems quite similar in all respects. It is not a rare lens, although it is certainly not encountered routinely either. Perhaps two thousand or a bit more were made, and I am sure it was sold mainly with Leotax camera bodies as their economy lens. Of course this level of production is vastly less than the Elmar, or say the Fed 5cm F3.5 from Russia, so it is not a common lens (but still not rare). My Simlar does not have a serial number on it (that I can find at least). The Simlar 5cm F3.5 is usually sold with Leotax camera bodies. One occasionally finds it for sale mounted on other, often rare, Japanese camera bodies for whatever reason. The Simlar is often found in relatively good condition too, although the presence of micro-coating scratches on the front element is common. If these scratches are not too numerous and clustered, they do not impact results. The Simlar appears to accept all accessories of the Elmar (hoods, push-on filters, etc.). It is also a coated lens, a distinct advantage over many examples of the Elmar.

My estimation of the market value of the Simlar 5cm F3.5 is that one in reasonably good condition is worth between $175 and $250. This is based on the few examples I have seen for sale over the last few years, and estimating the lens portion of the value from (mostly) Leotax camera+lens sales. This of course is not extraordinary money, as for example I would for example appraise a good coated Elmar LTM 5cm/3.5 at say $250-350 these days. Thus for a quality collectible prime lens for LTM, the Simlar is reasonably priced and certainly a contender as an alternative to the Leica Elmar.

So how does the Simlar perform optically? Well, I will not directly compare this lens to the Elmar, which is a very fine lens in the opinion of most who have used it (including me). I will say that in my opinion the Simlar is just about as good, and quite remarkable for a copy of such a distinguished lens. My impression is that the Elmar from the same time of the Simlar were made just a bit better; Leica finish quality is very hard to duplicate at reasonable cost, but the differences are evident only to the experienced eye. The Elmar may hold up better with time too, as Simlars more often need a CLA to get them back into top form, although most are usable as is.

Here are some specs on the Simlar:

Weight: 4.5 ounces (128 grams)
Filter Thread: 36mm push-on or A36 clamp-mount
Extension from camera body at infinity focus:  1.18″ (31mm)
Elements: 4 (?)
Minimum Aperture: F16, continuously adjustable

Here are some digital shots of my current Simlar 5cm F3.5 mounted on my fabulous Kardon Civilian. Following this are some shots taken with this combination using Agfa 100 color print film with minimal post-processing and scanned only to moderate resolution. The shot taken in my dining room was taken wide open – the sharpness at F3.5 is quite good for a four element lens.